fox: be at fox box

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fox box 1.00
be at fox hole 0.90
be at fox hunt 0.88
be at box 0.82
be at rabbit hutch 0.78
tail rabbit in wood 0.75
box present 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at rabbit hutch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(rabbit, be at rabbit hutch)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at rabbit hutch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fox, be at fox box)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fox, be at fox hole)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at box)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fox, be at box)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fox, be at fox hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fox, be at box)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox hole)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fox, be at box)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox box)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox box)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at rabbit hutch)