fox: be at grassy field

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grassy field 1.00
be at wooded area 0.82
be at ketucky field 0.81
be at field 0.81
be at meadow 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, be at grassy field)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fox, be at grassy field)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at ketucky field)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fox, be at wooded area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fox, be at meadow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fox, be at wooded area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at ketucky field)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fox, be at ketucky field)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fox, be at meadow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fox, be at field)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fox, be at field)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fox, be at ketucky field)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at wooded area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fox, be at wooded area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fox, be at meadow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at meadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, be at grassy field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fox, be at grassy field)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)