fox: be at hole

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hole 1.00
dig hole 0.90
be at hole in wood 0.90
dig that hole 0.89
build his hole in backyard 0.84
be at fox hole 0.84
be at hole under ficus 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(man, dig hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(man, dig that hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(man, dig that hole)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(man, dig hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(man, dig hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(man, dig that hole)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(man, dig hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hole)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(man, dig that hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fox, be at hole)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fox, build his hole in backyard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fox, be at fox hole)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fox, build his hole in backyard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox hole)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fox, build his hole in backyard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fox, be at fox hole)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox hole)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fox, build his hole in backyard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(man, dig hole)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(man, dig that hole)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(man, dig hole)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fox, be at hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(man, dig that hole)