fox: be at hunt

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hunt 1.00
hunt for food 0.93
hunt animal 0.90
be shoot by person who go hunt 0.88
be at fox hunt 0.85
hunt deer 0.85
be at english hunt 0.82
be at chase 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, hunt animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at hunt)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at hunt)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(predator, hunt for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at hunt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(predator, hunt for food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(man, hunt animal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(man, hunt animal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt for food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(predator, hunt for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hunt)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(man, hunt animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hunt)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hunt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(fox, be at hunt)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at english hunt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fox, be at english hunt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at english hunt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fox, be at fox hunt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fox, be at english hunt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at hunt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(predator, hunt for food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(man, hunt animal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(prey, be shoot by person who go hunt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(predator, hunt for food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fox, be at hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(man, hunt animal)