fox: be related to dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to dogs 1.00
is dogs 0.92
be like dogs 0.91
relate to dogs 0.90
has physical part canines 0.85
be afraid of dogs 0.85
be as pets 0.84
be pets 0.84
be like cats 0.83
is bad pets 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fox, be related to dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fox, is dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, be like dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, relate to dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fox, be like dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fox, relate to dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fox, be like dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fox, relate to dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fox, be afraid of dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fox, be afraid of dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fox, be afraid of dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fox, be afraid of dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fox, relate to dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, be like dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, be related to dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fox, be related to dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fox, be related to dogs)