fox: eat ducks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, gray fox
Weight: 0.40
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat ducks 1.00
eat chickens 0.86
eat chickens heads 0.84
eat eggs 0.82
kill chickens 0.82
eat chicken heads 0.80
bite heads off chickens 0.79
eat 0.79
take off chickens heads 0.79
rip heads off chickens 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fox, eat ducks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(man, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fox, eat ducks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fox, eat ducks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(predator, eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(man, eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(man, eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(red fox, kill chickens)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(coyote, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fox, eat ducks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(man, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fox, eat ducks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fox, eat ducks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(coyote, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(coyote, eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(red fox, kill chickens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(red fox, kill chickens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fox, eat ducks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fox, eat chickens)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat chickens)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fox, eat chickens)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fox, eat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fox, eat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fox, eat chickens)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fox, eat ducks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(predator, eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(man, eat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(red fox, kill chickens)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coyote, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(predator, eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(man, eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(fox, eat ducks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)