fox: get called cats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
get called cats 1.00
be like cats 0.95
eat cats 0.92
look like cats 0.91
act like cats 0.91
kill cats 0.91
be scared of cats 0.89
bark at cats 0.87
is dogs 0.86
attack cats 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(coyote, eat cats)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coyote, kill cats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(coyote, eat cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(coyote, eat cats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coyote, kill cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coyote, kill cats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fox, get called cats)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, look like cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fox, look like cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fox, look like cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fox, look like cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, is dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fox, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fox, is dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fox, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fox, get called cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(coyote, eat cats)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, get called cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(coyote, kill cats)