fox: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, gray fox
Weight: 0.40
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color black 0.97
has color brown 0.94
change to white color 0.94
has color red 0.93
has color yellow 0.93
is color 0.92
has color orange 0.90
is orange color 0.89
change to white color in winter 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mammal, has color brown) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mammal, has color brown)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has color brown)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has color black)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has color white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has color yellow)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has color brown)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has color orange)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mammal, has color brown) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fox, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red fox, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, has color black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(arctic fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has color white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(red fox, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(red fox, has color red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(red fox, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, has color yellow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red fox, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, has color orange)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(arctic fox, has color brown) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has color brown)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fox, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fox, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fox, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fox, has color red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mammal, has color brown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red fox, has color black)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red fox, has color red)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red fox, has color yellow)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has color white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red fox, has color orange)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has color brown)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fox, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mammal, has color brown)