fox: has four leg

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has four leg 1.00
has leg 0.92
has two leg for jump 0.90
has four limb 0.81
has two ear 0.79
be at his knee 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mammal, has leg)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, has four leg)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, has four limb)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, has four leg)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mammal, has four limb)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mammal, has leg)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has leg)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has four limb)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has four leg)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has two leg for jump)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has two ear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mammal, has leg)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fox, has four leg)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mammal, has four limb)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fox, has four leg)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rabbit, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has four leg)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has two leg for jump)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has two leg for jump)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rabbit, has two ear)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has two ear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fox, has four leg)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, has four leg)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mammal, has leg)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mammal, has four limb)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rabbit, has four leg)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has two leg for jump)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rabbit, has two ear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mammal, has leg)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(fox, has four leg)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mammal, has four limb)