fox: have black feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have black feet 1.00
have small black feet 0.96
have small feet 0.91
has physical part feet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have black feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have black feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fox, have black feet)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fox, have small black feet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fox, have small black feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fox, have small black feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part feet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, have small black feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, have black feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(red fox, have black feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, have black feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)