fox: have bushy tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bushy tails 1.00
have long bushy tails 0.99
have long tails 0.82
have big tails 0.81
have two tails 0.81
has physical part tails 0.79
has physical part whiskers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fox, have bushy tails)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have long bushy tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fox, have two tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fox, have long tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fox, has physical part tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fox, have big tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fox, have two tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fox, have two tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, have two tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)