fox: is hunted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hunted 1.00
get hunted 0.98
is hunting 0.82
be bad hunting 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is hunted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(arctic fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is hunted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(red fox, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fox, is hunted)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fox, get hunted)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fox, get hunted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fox, be bad hunting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fox, get hunted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fox, be bad hunting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fox, get hunted)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fox, be bad hunting)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fox, be bad hunting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fox, is hunted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is hunted)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fox, is hunted)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red fox, is hunted)