fox: live in arctic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in arctic 1.00
get coats in arctic 0.87
live in tundra 0.85
live in desert 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, live in desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, live in arctic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, live in tundra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(arctic fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, live in arctic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(arctic fox, live in tundra)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, live in tundra)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, live in desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coyote, live in desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coyote, live in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fox, live in arctic)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fox, live in tundra)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fox, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fox, live in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fox, live in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fox, live in tundra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fox, live in tundra)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, live in arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(arctic fox, live in arctic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, live in tundra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coyote, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in arctic)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coyote, live in desert)