fox: live in holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in holes 1.00
dig holes 0.87
dig holes in garden 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(coyote, dig holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(coyote, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coyote, dig holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fox, live in holes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fox, dig holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fox, dig holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, dig holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fox, dig holes in garden)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fox, dig holes in garden)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(fox, dig holes in garden)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fox, dig holes in garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fox, live in holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coyote, dig holes)