fracture: be common between l1

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laceration
Weight: 0.52
, clavicle
Weight: 0.48
, femur
Weight: 0.42
, tibia
Weight: 0.39
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common between l1 1.00
be common between t12 0.88
is common 0.78
vary between men 0.76
were important in australia between 1901-1914 0.75
vary between women 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cause, vary between women)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cause, vary between men)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between l1)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cause, vary between men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cause, vary between women)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cause, vary between women)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cause, vary between men)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cause, vary between women)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cause, vary between men)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fracture, be common between l1)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fracture, be common between t12)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between t12)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common between t12)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fracture, is common)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fracture, is common)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fracture, is common)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between t12)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between l1)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cause, vary between men)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cause, vary between women)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cause, vary between men)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cause, vary between women)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fracture, be common between l1)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)