fracture: be most common in elderly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laceration
Weight: 0.52
, clavicle
Weight: 0.48
, femur
Weight: 0.42
, tibia
Weight: 0.39
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be most common in elderly 1.00
be most common in elderly individuals 0.95
be common in elderly individuals 0.93
be most common in older adults 0.87
be most common in adults 0.86
be most common in individuals 0.84
be common in individuals 0.80
is common 0.80
were common occurrence among first fliers 0.76
be common between t12 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly individuals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly individuals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fracture, be common in elderly individuals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fracture, be common in elderly individuals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly individuals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common in elderly individuals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fracture, be most common in adults)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fracture, be most common in older adults)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in older adults)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in adults)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fracture, be most common in individuals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in individuals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fracture, be most common in adults)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fracture, be most common in older adults)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fracture, is common)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fracture, be common in individuals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fracture, is common)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fracture, be common in individuals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fracture, be most common in individuals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly individuals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fracture, is common)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common in individuals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in adults)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common in elderly individuals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fracture, be common between t12)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fracture, be common between t12)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in older adults)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common between t12)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in individuals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common between t12)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common in individuals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fracture, be most common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)