fracture: has physical part callus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laceration
Weight: 0.52
, clavicle
Weight: 0.48
, femur
Weight: 0.42
, tibia
Weight: 0.39
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part callus 1.00
has physical part elbow 0.76
is long bone 0.76
be called bone 0.76
be bone can fracture 0.75
be called shin bone 0.75
has physical part knee 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(femur, is long bone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(clavicle, be bone can fracture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tibia, be called bone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tibia, be called shin bone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tibia, be called shin bone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tibia, be called shin bone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tibia, be called bone)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tibia, be called bone)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(femur, is long bone)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(femur, is long bone)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(clavicle, be bone can fracture)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clavicle, be bone can fracture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fracture, has physical part callus)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fracture, has physical part knee)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part knee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fracture, has physical part knee)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part knee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part callus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tibia, be called bone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tibia, be called shin bone)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(femur, is long bone)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part callus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clavicle, be bone can fracture)