framework: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.68
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, approach
Weight: 0.60
, system
Weight: 0.57
Siblings schema
Weight: 0.58
, maven
Weight: 0.46
, guideline
Weight: 0.33
, dialogue
Weight: 0.33
, outline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
make great 0.80
has quality function 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality advantage 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, make great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(system, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(policy, make great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(system, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(policy, make great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(schema, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, make great)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(schema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(schema, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialogue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dialogue, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(framework, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(framework, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, make great)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(schema, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialogue, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, make great)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(framework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)