france: be divided into departments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents saudi arabia
Weight: 0.70
, europe
Weight: 0.67
, european union
Weight: 0.65
, south africa
Weight: 0.64
, germany
Weight: 0.63
Siblings tour de france
Weight: 0.37
, spain
Weight: 0.37
, italy
Weight: 0.37
, england
Weight: 0.37
, jordan
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be divided into departments 1.00
be divided into smaller political units 0.83
be divided 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(germany, be divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(france, be divided into departments)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(germany, be divided)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(germany, be divided)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(england, be divided)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(germany, be divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(france, be divided into departments)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(england, be divided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(england, be divided)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(france, be divided into departments)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(france, be divided)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(france, be divided)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into smaller political units)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(france, be divided)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(france, be divided into smaller political units)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(france, be divided into smaller political units)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(france, be divided into smaller political units)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into departments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(france, be divided into departments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(germany, be divided)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(england, be divided)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(france, be divided into departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(germany, be divided)