franchise: be important in system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, opportunity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings star wars
Weight: 0.67
, halo
Weight: 0.61
, twilight
Weight: 0.59
, subway
Weight: 0.58
, doom
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in system 1.00
be important in american system 0.84
be important in constitutional system 0.81
be important in american constitutional system 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(franchise, be important in system)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be important in american system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be important in constitutional system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be important in american constitutional system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(franchise, be important in american constitutional system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(franchise, be important in constitutional system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(franchise, be important in american system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(franchise, be important in constitutional system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(franchise, be important in american constitutional system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(franchise, be important in american system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(franchise, be important in constitutional system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(franchise, be important in american constitutional system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(franchise, be important in american system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be important in system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(franchise, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(franchise, be important in system)