franchise: be thought of of hybrid form of ownership

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, opportunity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings star wars
Weight: 0.67
, halo
Weight: 0.61
, twilight
Weight: 0.59
, subway
Weight: 0.58
, doom
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be thought of of hybrid form of ownership 1.00
be thought as as hybrid form of ownership 0.99
be thought of of form of ownership 0.92
be thought of of hybrid form 0.92
be thought as as form of ownership 0.91
be thought as as hybrid form 0.90
be thought of of form 0.79
be thought as as form 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form of ownership)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form of ownership)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form of ownership)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought of of form of ownership)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought as as form of ownership)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought as as form of ownership)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought of of form of ownership)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought as as form of ownership)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought of of form of ownership)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form of ownership)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought of of form)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(franchise, be thought as as form)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought of of form)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought as as form)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought as as hybrid form)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought of of form)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(franchise, be thought as as form)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of form of ownership)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought as as form of ownership)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of form)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought as as form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(franchise, be thought of of hybrid form of ownership)