fraternity: get hate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents campus
Weight: 0.59
, body
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings university
Weight: 0.34
, greek
Weight: 0.32
, association
Weight: 0.32
, family member
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hate 1.00
do 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(organization, do)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fraternity, get hate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(organization, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(organization, do)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(organization, do)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fraternity, get hate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fraternity, get hate)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fraternity, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fraternity, do)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fraternity, do)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, get hate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fraternity, get hate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(organization, do)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(fraternity, get hate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(organization, do)