fraud: take place in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scandal
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fortune teller
Weight: 0.57
, corruption
Weight: 0.34
, barrack
Weight: 0.34
, bribery
Weight: 0.34
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
take place in business 1.00
take place 0.92
takes place outside states 0.83
be bad for business 0.82
affect on business 0.81
occur in business 0.81
takes place outside united states 0.80
affect business 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(problem, occur in business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fraud, take place in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(problem, occur in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(problem, occur in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bribery, take place)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(problem, occur in business)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fraud, take place in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(bribery, take place)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bribery, take place)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fraud, take place in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fraud, take place in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(problem, occur in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bribery, take place)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(fraud, take place in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(problem, occur in business)