freak: be in greatest showman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.55
, tv show
Weight: 0.54
, word
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.52
Siblings loser
Weight: 0.48
, midget
Weight: 0.42
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in greatest showman 1.00
be in showman 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(freak, be in greatest showman)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(freak, be in showman)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(freak, be in showman)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(freak, be in showman)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(freak, be in showman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(freak, be in greatest showman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(freak, be in greatest showman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(freak, be in greatest showman)