free will: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, subject
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings free time
Weight: 0.36
, now
Weight: 0.32
, do
Weight: 0.32
, time travel
Weight: 0.32
, healthy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is ungiven good 0.87
is good thing 0.78
has quality advantage 0.77
better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(do, better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(time travel, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(do, better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(do, better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(free will, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(free will, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(free will, has quality advantage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(free will, has quality advantage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(free will, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(free will, has quality advantage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(free will, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(free will, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality advantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free will, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(time travel, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(do, better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(free will, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)