free will: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, subject
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings free time
Weight: 0.36
, now
Weight: 0.32
, do
Weight: 0.32
, time travel
Weight: 0.32
, healthy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
is good thing 0.95
is same thing 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(free will, is thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(free will, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(free will, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(free will, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(free will, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(free will, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(free will, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(free will, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(free will, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(free will, is thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)