freezer: smell good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.56
Siblings refrigerator
Weight: 0.39
, fridge
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
smell good 1.00
smell 0.96
burn smell 0.88
burn taste bad 0.81
burn taste 0.76
burned meat taste bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fridge, smell)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, smell)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fridge, smell)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fridge, smell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(refrigerator, smell)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, smell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(freezer, smell good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(freezer, smell)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(freezer, smell)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(freezer, smell)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(freezer, burn smell)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn smell)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(freezer, burn smell)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(freezer, burned meat taste bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(freezer, burned meat taste bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burned meat taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn smell)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(freezer, burned meat taste bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freezer, smell good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fridge, smell)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(freezer, smell good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(refrigerator, smell)