freezing: is water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
Siblings freeze
Weight: 0.35
, cold water
Weight: 0.34
, cold
Weight: 0.33
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.33
, cold weather
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is water 1.00
affect mass of water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cold, is water)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cold water, is water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(cold water, is water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cold water, is water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cold, is water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cold, is water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(freezing, is water)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(freezing, affect mass of water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(freezing, affect mass of water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(freezing, affect mass of water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(freezing, affect mass of water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freezing, is water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(freezing, is water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cold water, is water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(freezing, is water)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cold, is water)