french fry: be better on way home

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better on way home 1.00
be better on way 0.94
be better in car 0.82
be called way 0.82
make them sweeter 0.76
be healthy for us 0.76
be good for body 0.76
make best friends 0.76
be healthier than white 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(french fry, be better on way home)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be good for body)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(french fry, be better on way home)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(french fry, be better in car)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(french fry, be better in car)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better in car)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(french fry, be better in car)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(french fry, be called way)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called way)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called way)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(french fry, be called way)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, be better on way)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(french fry, be better on way)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(french fry, make best friends)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(french fry, be better on way)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(french fry, make best friends)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(french fry, make best friends)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(french fry, make best friends)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(french fry, be better on way home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(french fry, be better on way home)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)