french fry: be called fry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called fry 1.00
be called french fry 0.93
be called fries 0.79
need two stage frying process 0.77
is fried 0.77
is cooked 0.77
be called french fries 0.77
is coated prior to deep frying 0.76
be called fries yahoo 0.75
taste good cooked 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(french fry, be called fry)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(french fry, be called french fry)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called french fry)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called french fry)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called french fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries yahoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(french fry, be called french fry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries yahoo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries yahoo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(french fry, be called french fries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french fry, be called french fries)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called french fries)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries yahoo)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(french fry, be called fry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)