french fry: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
taste good 0.79
be bad for health 0.77
is good food product 0.77
be good for earth 0.75
be healthy for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(french fry, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(french fry, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(french fry, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(french fry, be bad for health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be bad for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(french fry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)