french fry: is damn delicious

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn delicious 1.00
is delicious 0.92
is less delicious 0.90
taste like shit 0.83
get damn mushy 0.82
taste good cooked 0.80
taste good freshly cooked 0.79
taste good 0.78
taste cooked 0.77
is funny 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(french fry, is delicious)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(french fry, is less delicious)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(french fry, is delicious)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, is less delicious)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(french fry, is less delicious)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(french fry, is delicious)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, taste like shit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste like shit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is less delicious)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(french fry, taste like shit)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste like shit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(french fry, get damn mushy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is delicious)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french fry, is damn delicious)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)