french fry: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste bad day 0.96
taste cold 0.90
taste bad next day 0.89
taste good cooked 0.87
taste bitter 0.87
taste like shit 0.86
taste like vomit 0.84
taste cooked 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, taste bitter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sweet potato, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, taste bitter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bitter)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste like vomit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(french fry, taste like vomit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste like vomit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad day)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bitter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(french fry, taste like vomit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bad day)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste like shit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, taste like shit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste like shit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad day)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(french fry, taste like shit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad next day)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bad day)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad next day)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cold)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bad next day)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bad next day)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sweet potato, taste bitter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)