french fry: taste cooked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste cooked 1.00
taste good cooked 0.98
is cooked 0.94
taste freshly cooked 0.92
taste good freshly cooked 0.92
is cooked twice 0.87
taste good 0.84
taste reheating 0.84
taste cold 0.83
taste bad 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(french fry, taste reheating)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(french fry, taste bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste reheating)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste reheating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french fry, taste reheating)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, taste bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cold)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(french fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)