french restaurant: be at big city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big city 1.00
be at large city 0.90
be at major city 0.90
be at any large city 0.87
be at city 0.87
be at many city 0.86
be at any big north american city 0.85
be at large town 0.84
be at nice part of town 0.82
be at most city in world 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at big city)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at nice part of town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at any big north american city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(french restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)