french restaurant: be at manhattan

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.76 , place Weight: 0.57 , must Weight: 0.48 , food Weight: 0.45
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.42 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.41 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.40 , japanese restaurant Weight: 0.40 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at manhattan	1.00
be at nyc	0.83
be at chicago	0.78
be at berkeley	0.78
be at chinatown	0.76
be at seattle	0.76
be at montreal	0.76
be at chinese neighborhood	0.76
be at new york city	0.76
be at new york	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at montreal)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)