french restaurant: be at many city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at many city 1.00
be at city 0.91
be at large city 0.87
be at most city in world 0.86
be at big city 0.86
be at any large city 0.85
be at major city 0.83
be at downtown area 0.80
be at britsh town 0.80
be at town 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(place, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at big city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(place, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food, be at city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at big city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(place, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(food, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(place, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(restaurant, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(place, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at major city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at britsh town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at many city)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at big city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at downtown area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at downtown area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at many city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at large city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at large city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at most city in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at major city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at britsh town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(place, be at city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(place, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(food, be at city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(french restaurant, be at many city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at big city)