french restaurant: be at nyc

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at nyc 1.00
be at chicago 0.83
be at manhattan 0.83
be at seattle 0.81
be at new york 0.79
be at new york city 0.79
be at montreal 0.78
be at berkeley 0.78
be at michigan 0.77
be at tulsa 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at manhattan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at seattle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)