french restaurant: be at quebec

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at quebec 1.00
be at canada 0.80
be at montreal 0.79
be at mexico 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at quebec)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at quebec)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be at montreal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at montreal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at quebec)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(french restaurant, be at quebec)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)