french restaurant: be used to dine in style

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to dine in style 1.00
be used to dine 0.92
be at dine room 0.89
be used to fine dine and impress others 0.85
be used to eat dinner 0.82
be used to have dinner 0.79
be used to dinner 0.79
be used to eat indian style food 0.79
be used to go out for dinner 0.79
be used to enjoy sushi 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(food, be at dine room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dine room)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to dine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat indian style food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(food, be at dine room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat indian style food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat indian style food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to fine dine and impress others)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to fine dine and impress others)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to fine dine and impress others)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to fine dine and impress others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat indian style food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dine)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(food, be at dine room)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(french restaurant, be used to dine in style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)