french restaurant: be used to have good meal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to have good meal 1.00
be used to have meal 0.97
be used to eat meal without cook 0.89
be used to eat to have lunch 0.89
be used to sit down for meal 0.88
be used to purchase meal 0.87
be used to have dinner 0.86
be used to eat dinner 0.86
be used to eat good bread 0.85
be used to eat tasty food 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat good bread)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat good bread)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat good bread)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat good bread)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)