french restaurant: be used to sit down for meal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to sit down for meal 1.00
be used to have meal 0.88
be used to have good meal 0.88
be used to go out for dinner 0.87
be used to eat meal without cook 0.86
be used to eat to have lunch 0.85
be used to eat dinner 0.84
be used to eat out 0.83
be used to purchase meal 0.82
be used to eat at 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to purchase meal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(french restaurant, be used to sit down for meal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)