french: be in parts of america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents europe
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.57
, type
Weight: 0.56
, language
Weight: 0.55
Siblings american english
Weight: 0.64
, portuguese
Weight: 0.54
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.47
, bourgeois
Weight: 0.38
, france
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in parts of america 1.00
were more successful than british forming with american indians 0.79
help american against british 0.78
be important in canada 0.76
be in canada 0.76
be related detroit 0.75
was guiana part of france 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(french, be in parts of america)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(french, be related detroit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(french, was guiana part of france)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(french, was guiana part of france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(french, was guiana part of france)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(french, was guiana part of france)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(french, be related detroit)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(french, be related detroit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(french, be related detroit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(french, be in parts of america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(french, be in parts of america)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(french, be in parts of america)