french: be rude to american

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents europe
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.57
, type
Weight: 0.56
, language
Weight: 0.55
Siblings american english
Weight: 0.64
, portuguese
Weight: 0.54
, france
Weight: 0.36
, italy
Weight: 0.35
, italian language
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rude to american 1.00
be rude 0.90
be different from british english 0.78
be different than australian english 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(american english, be different than australian english)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(american english, be different from british english)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(american english, be different from british english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(american english, be different from british english)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(american english, be different than australian english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(american english, be different than australian english)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(french, be rude to american)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(french, be rude)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(french, be rude)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(french, be rude)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude to american)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(french, be rude to american)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(american english, be different from british english)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(french, be rude to american) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(american english, be different than australian english)