frequency: be independent of amplitude

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.68
, parameter
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.65
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
, quantity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.36
, density
Weight: 0.35
, wavelength
Weight: 0.35
, volume
Weight: 0.34
, jitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be independent of amplitude 1.00
be related to amplitude 0.93
affect amplitude 0.92
is independent variable 0.78
is modulation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, is modulation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(amplitude, is modulation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(amplitude, is modulation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(frequency, be independent of amplitude)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to amplitude)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be independent of amplitude)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(frequency, be independent of amplitude)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be independent of amplitude) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amplitude, is modulation)