fresh food: be better than food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.74
, topic
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings fresh fruit
Weight: 0.76
, egg
Weight: 0.66
, bread
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than food 1.00
be better than frozen food 0.89
be much better tasting than food 0.88
be much better tasting than frozen food 0.87
be considered better than packaged food 0.86
has quality better 0.82
is more expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fresh food, be better than food)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fresh food, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)