fresh food: be better than frozen food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.74
, topic
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings fresh fruit
Weight: 0.76
, egg
Weight: 0.66
, bread
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than frozen food 1.00
be much better tasting than frozen food 0.92
be better than food 0.89
be considered better than packaged food 0.83
be much better tasting than food 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fresh food, be much better tasting than frozen food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)