fresh food: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.74
, topic
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings fresh fruit
Weight: 0.76
, egg
Weight: 0.66
, bread
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is cheaper 0.86
be better than food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fresh food, is expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fresh food, be better than food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)