fresh water: be important to human activities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.67
, water
Weight: 0.64
, necessity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings salt water
Weight: 0.76
, drinking water
Weight: 0.75
, sea water
Weight: 0.71
, river
Weight: 0.66
, pond
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to human activities 1.00
be important to activities 0.93
be important to humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(river, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(river, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(river, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(fresh water, be important to human activities)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fresh water, be important to activities)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fresh water, be important to humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fresh water, be important to activities)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fresh water, be important to activities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fresh water, be important to activities)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fresh water, be important to humans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fresh water, be important to humans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fresh water, be important to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fresh water, be important to human activities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fresh water, be important to human activities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fresh water, be important to human activities)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(river, be important to humans)