freshwater: be important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, resource
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.36
, diatom
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, alga
Weight: 0.35
, marsh
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to humans 1.00
be important to us 0.76
is important to 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to humans)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(diatom, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(diatom, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(diatom, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(freshwater, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(freshwater, be important to us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(freshwater, is important to)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(freshwater, is important to)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(freshwater, is important to)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, is important to)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diatom, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to us)